UW/CIMMS Convective Initiation Product Being Tested by WFOs

As part of the GOES-R proving ground, several WFO’s have been evaluating a suite of products from the University of Wisconsin/CIMMS satellite meteorology group.  While the host of products includes functionality to access cloud top cooling, overshooting tops, turbulence probability, lightning probability, thermal couplet detection and magnitude and severe weather probability, the main focus has been on the Convective Initiation (CI) product. While the algorithm is fairly complex, the basic idea is to use brightness temperatures to calculate cloud top cooling rates.  Considering these cooling rates along with microphysical phase change data, the areas most likely to see convective initiation are highlighted by the algorithm and displayed to the forecaster.  A three tiered system is currently in place in which pre-CI cloud growth areas are highlighted in green, areas where CI is likely to occur in yellow and areas where CI is currently ongoing in red.

While the product is designed to recognize CI before significant radar returns develop, it does have some drawbacks in that it will not work well in a cirrus dominated regime.  In addition, because of a box-average approach to measuring brightness temperature, fast moving clouds will tend to cause false alarms. Preliminary statistics show that the product detects over half of CI events and false alarm about once every 4 times. At its best, the CI product has been shown to indicate CI as much as 37 minutes before radar returns reach 35 dBz.

Several WFO’s around Eastern Region have been involved in actively evaluating the CI product performance including Greenville-Spartanburg, Raleigh, Charleston SC, Cleveland, Charleston WV, and Binghamton as well as Eastern Region Headquarters. After compiling comments from several of the offices mentioned, the reviews thus far of the CI product are mixed but there is good reason for that. By far, the biggest drawback seems to be that the CI product usually does not provide any significant increase in lead time when used in conjunction with the current GOES-13 infrared satellite data due to the fact that imagery usually only comes into AWIPS every half hour or so.  The product was not meant to be used with GOES-13, however, it was meant to be used with the new GOES-R satellite which is slated to first launch in 2015.  GOES-R will include an Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) which will provide 10 infrared channels at a temporal resolution more than five times faster than GOES-13.  With this system in place, CI imagery will no doubt prove much more effective in terms of lead time. Feedback from the offices to this point has been fairly consistent.

Here at WFO Raleigh, we have noticed that the product tends to work better in pulse storm situations rather than those with a lot of forcing involved. This probably has to do with the box-average approach and storms propagating outside of the pre-determined area needed to properly evaluate brightness temperatures. Despite this, the potential usefulness of this product should not be overlooked. As operational forecasters, it is easy to discount the usefulness of a tool in its developing stages because there is so much other data to look at. Once fully operational with the GOES-R platform, the CI product could be a useful situational awareness tool.  It could be used as a guide for radar operators on where they may need to allocate their resources in the near future, especially for discrete cells that may pop up away from more active areas. In addition, there have been a couple of times this year when we were not sure whether or not radar data would be available for a particular event. The CI product would be extremely useful when using satellite data and adjacent radars to interrogate storm cells. WFO Raleigh has started archiving CI imagery on a daily basis in order to further evaluate the CI product and identify situations where it excels. Below is one example from 1 June 2011 in the southern Appalachians where convective initiation was detected well in advance of the first lightning strikes.



Sieglaff, J.M., L.M. Cronce, W.F. Feltz, K.M. Bedka, M.J. Pavolonis, and A. Heidinger 2010: Nowcasting convective storm initiation using box-averaged cloud-top cooling and microphysical phase trends. Submitted to J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. January, 2010.

Accumulated CI Image from RAH AWIPS

About Ryan Ellis - WFO Raleigh, NC

Meteorologist, NWS WFO Raleigh, NC B.S. University of Miami 2004 M.S. University of Hawai'i 2008
This entry was posted in Satellite. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to UW/CIMMS Convective Initiation Product Being Tested by WFOs

  1. Frank says:

    Ryan and all,

    As you mentioned, I think the real key to this product will be its usefulness in the GOES-R era, but I have found some successes even in the current, somewhat limited GOES status.

    In one example we have documented, we saw a CI singal at 2345Z over two developing cells in close proximity. Here are some of the “88D vitals” on the two cells

    Cell 1 0.5 R CR POSH VIL (cell based)
    2343Z -2 30-35 None None
    2347Z 0 50-55 0 12
    2352Z 21 60-65 60 39
    2356Z 44 65-70 60 38
    0000Z 59 65-70 30 34

    Cell 2
    2343Z 0 15-20 None None
    2347Z 0 35-40 None None
    2352Z 11 50-55 0 10
    2356Z 36 60-65 60 45
    0000Z 55 65-70 50 48
    0004Z 59 60-65 70 59

    Dave Radell (ER) and I are doing a poster at the GOES-R User’s conference about eastern region’s use of the GOES-R Proving Ground Products, which includes the UCWI product. If you have any good cases documented, I would love to reference them.


    • ryanelliswforah says:

      Hi Frank,

      Thanks for the feedback. Like Jonathan said, we have also been able to see some success stories through the current GOES system although we haven’t documented any of the vitals. I will certainly keep my eye out for good cases and then if we get one I would certainly be willing to share that with you. In the mean time good luck with the poster.


  2. Jonathan Blaes @ WFO RAH says:

    Frank, thanks for the reply. We have a basic qualitative review of a few cases but nothing terribly detailed. We want to do a couple of cases reviewing not just the satellite data but compare to radar data just as you did, which is great. We have a couple of cases which were included in our input to ERH last month but nothing terribly deep. Ryan is leading this project on our end and I am sure he will want to compare notes with you.

    Note that we are archiving the raw data from CIMMS that comes in through our LDM and we are grabbing a days worth of visibile imager superimposed with CG lightning data and the CI product. We started the daily archive in late June and will continue it through the summer or until AWIPS II intereferes.

    Thanks, Jonathan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s