Tropical Cyclone QPF/Boundary Interaction cases

The Tropical Cyclone QPF/Boundary Interaction group is looking to identify tropical cyclones that interacted with boundaries and caused forecast problems for forecasters. WFO Raleigh NC State student volunteer Rebecca Duell recently identified a total of 54 Tropical Cyclones (TCs) that moved through the CSTAR domain shown below since 1995. The domain is likely larger than the final study domain but we intended to cast a wide net since it would be easier to eliminate cases upon further analysis. The cases were initially identified via a geographic search of all TCs that moved through the domain based on the Atlantic tropical cyclone track maps by year provided by the AOML website. These cases were then cross checked with the 3 resources provided by Jordan Dale which were from 3 NC State master’s theses that contain lists of landfalling TCs in or near a portion of the study region. 

The cases were added to a spreadsheet and they should provide an initial starting point for investigation for additional case identification. The spreadsheet contains a list of the storms with the year, storm name, the intensity at landfall or closest approach (TS/Cat1-2/Cat3+), landfall location, a link to the HPC precipitation analysis map, and the NHC report for the storm.

Spreadsheet with all storms

Dr. Gary Lackmann and Jordan Dale are currently working to trim the list down to a manageable subset of cases for further investigation.  Once that list is available, they will likely be looking for input from WFO’s and other CSTAR participants.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in TC and Boundary QPF. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Tropical Cyclone QPF/Boundary Interaction cases

  1. cyclone god says:

    Thanks for writing this post. It’s exactly what I was looking for.

  2. Pingback: CSTAR Update – notes from the quarterly conference call on 02 December | CIMMSE

  3. Lee Rings says:

    Informed decision-making comes from a long tradition of guessing after which blaming others for inadequate results.
    Nearly all men talk to failure because of their insufficient persistence in creating new intends to take the place of those that fail.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s